In the center of the storm in Alaska

September 3rd, 2008

Those of us in the Pacific Northwest have a greater affinity with the state of Alaska than any other in the country….with the possible exception of Hawaii.

But journalists from the rest of the country, and the world, probably base their perceptions about Alaska more on reruns of “Northern Exposure” than the first-hand knowledge we have of our northern neighbors. Editor & Publisher has an interesting interview with the editor of the Anchorage Daily News as he and the newspaper’s other staff find themselves in the center of a media firestorm over the selection of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as the vice-presidential running mate with Republican Sen. John McCain. Are Alaskans a bunch of moose-meat munching, parka wearing yahoos running around town on their dogsleds? Don’t go by stereotype!

For the record, the Blog’s favorite thing in Alaska’s newspapers is the Anchorage Daily News’ web gallery of bear sighting photos sent in by readers. Check it out at adn.com!

Group interested in Maine papers ends exclusivity deal

August 28th, 2008

A group of investors interested in buying the Maine newspapers owned by The Seattle Times Co. has ended an agreement that gave it exclusive negotiating rights on a sale, reports the Kennebec Journal.

This means the group will have to compete with other bidders, if any other serious bidders surface. The Blethen family says it must sell the newspapers in order to focus on operation of its Washington state properties, including The Seattle Times and the Yakima Herald-Republic.

Online ad revenue stalls and staggers

August 27th, 2008

An article from Advertising Age zeros in on the flatlining online ad revenues at The New York Times and other metro newspapers. Perhaps it IS time to think about funding journalism through partnership with the most profitable businesses raking in cash on the Web: the porn and cheap prescription drug cartels.

Times negotiations update

August 13th, 2008

Times Guild and management negotiators met today (Wednesday, Aug. 6) to further discuss contract proposals.

First on the agenda was the company’s proposal to change the way it handles employee cell phones.

Under the proposal, the company could reimburse employees $25 a month for cell-phone use or $35 a month for phones with e-mail capability, if you’re required to use a cell phone for work. This would be in place of issuing employees a company-paid phone.

Because so many of you had concerns about this, we asked several questions about liability for contracts and costs (both usage fees and equipment costs).

Management representatives said that they want to offer this as an option for people who don’t want to have to carry both a personal and work cell phone. Guild bargainers pointed out that this doesn’t seem to be what’s reflected in the language of the proposal.

Company bargainers said that they understood that an opt-in program might be more attractive to us; they said they would reconsider the language of their proposal.

What’s a little unclear is why they’d need a contract proposal to offer this kind of reimbursement plan, if it’s completely optional. Nothing in the current contract would preclude that.

We also spent some time asking more questions about the company’s proposed changes to the medical plan, and about the way things are handled now.

We’re now awaiting the company’s list of proposed bargaining dates in order to schedule our next meeting.

Some new directions from Guild President Bernie Lunzer

August 12th, 2008

Bernie Lunzer, endorsed by the Pacific Northwest Newspaper Guild in the recent international election, gives an interview with Editor & Publisher outlining some new directions in regard to advertising employees and newspaper ownership.

Better news in Seattle?

August 7th, 2008

Latest on The Seattle Times and Teamsters Local 174 negotiations:

Date: August 7, 2008
To: All Employees
From: Alayne Fardella
Subject: Quick Labor Update

You may have heard that on Tuesday, July 29 Teamster’s #174, which represents our transportation drivers, gave us a 30-day notice terminating the current labor contract. Doing so meant that the union would be free to engage in what it called a “work stoppage”. You’ll recall that the local union representatives have consistently refused to meet with us since November, agreeing to only a handful of dates. We were very disappointed at the threat of a potential “work stoppage” after so little bargaining.

The International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT) from Washington, D.C. has now requested to be part of the discussions. Top representatives from the IBT are planning to join us in bargaining on August 14. The IBT, the Teamsters Joint Council, Local #174 and The Seattle Times has agreed to:

Stop the clock on the 30-day termination notice to allow for a 14-day negotiation period. After that, the clock will resume, leaving 23 days until a “work stoppage” could occur.

2) Suspend rate reductions for drivers hauling lower weighted loads, a provision of the current contract.

We’ve said all along we’re looking for successful resolution. After only seven meetings so far, we are hopeful that the upcoming participation of IBT may help move the discussion ahead in a meaningful way.

We respect all of our employees and how challenging it is to be in our industry at this time – it is certainly not for the faint-hearted. We continue to be fortunate to have our local ownership’s unwavering commitment to the mission of serving the community with journalistic excellence. However, the decline in revenue continues to put our business at considerable risk. We must look to every avenue for cost savings to help us get through this economic downturn and address the structural changes needed to survive.

I will keep you informed as we, hopefully, move forward. As always, if you have questions, ask your department head, Chris Biencourt or me.

Thank you for your continued hard work and your partnership in protecting our future.

Alayne

Some good news from Maine?

August 7th, 2008

Our brothers and sisters in Maine met with the potential buyers of the Blethen Maine Newspapers and so far, so good. Here’s the latest, from the front.

Times bargaining cancelled for a caucus day

August 5th, 2008

From Guild Administrative Officer Liz Brown:

The Guild negotiation team at The Seattle Times cancelled a bargaining session scheduled for Wednesday in order to meet privately and work on counter proposals.

The next Times negotiation session will be from 1 to 5 p.m. Wednesday, Aug. 13, in the Vancouver conference room of the Denny Building.

We hope members who were planning to attend tomorrow’s session will be able to attend as observers on Aug. 13. For the protocol to follow as observers, please scroll to an earlier post.

Potential buyers for Blethen Maine papers

July 31st, 2008

The Portland Press Herald is reporting that a group of local buyers has surfaced with interest in purchasing the newspapers in Maine owned by The Seattle Times Co.

Buying these papers and borrowing $230 million to do so was a bad business decision, and unloading them–depending on the terms–could help save the Blethen family’s ownership of its Washington newspapers.

Newspapers should close their web sites!

July 31st, 2008

So says Ted Rall, in a column filched from AltWeeklies.com. As our mamas told us, who will buy the cow when they can get the milk for free? Newspapers must stop giving away their product for free and cut out slimy little aggregators like the Blog who don’t do original reporting and steal material from those fitting the bill for reporting infrastructure.

Interesting idea, but it will never happen. What do you think?